Linus Pauling, the renowned American
double Nobel Prize winner, argued that there was a time, when Homo sapiens
belonged to organisms known as herbivora,
or devourers of plants. He based his claim on the teeth in the human mouth. The
incisors are necessary for cutting, the premolars and molars are suitable for
grinding our food, and the canines or fangs, necessary for tearing meat apart,
are virtually nonexistent. Evolution, he argued, has equipped us with teeth
necessary for successful survival.
Only… things change.
Since the good old days when we were
agrarian societies, some of us became hunters and gatherers. It is the hunters
who created the problems. Not only our teeth but also our whole organisms were
not well disposed towards it. For example, as we increased our consumption of
meat, we run short of vitamin C. Previously abundant for millions of years in
our daily diet, our bodies had no need to produce it’s own. Without the
supplement, the ancient mariners developed scurvy and a number of other
illnesses.
As for tearing food apart, we found
a brilliant way out. Not only a knife and fork helped, but also the vast
majority of the Western world developed a taste for hamburgers. Not only was
tearing of food no longer necessary but the meat was already ground to a pulp,
pre-masticated for easy absorption by badly equipped human mouths.
Only one problem remained.
Herbivores, which according to our
teeth, we still are, tend to graze most of the time. We did so, for millions of
years to assure our survival. Habits seldom change, and now that meat replaced
the essentials of our daily diet we continue to eat most of the time, consuming
vastly too many calories, and running terribly short of vitamins, minerals and
other nutrients, available only from the food we gave up, yet on which our
bodies ‘grazed’ for the said millions of years.
It has been said that the North
Americans and Western Europeans of the Human species are the most overfed and,
simultaneously, the most undernourished species on Earth.
Over the years the so-called poor
became fat, then obese, while the rich, with the possible exception of some
Arab sheiks and Central American and African dictators, remained slim and
healthy. Perhaps the poor became poor in spirit, rather than in cultivating
their physical contours that would attest to their wellbeing. Don’t get me
wrong. There are still poor in most western cities. They are the homeless, the
rejects of our society, who huddle in dark corners, at night, to preserve their
body heat. They are the true poor. Not those living on the handouts of affluent
society of predominantly fat people.
Could it be that the real poor are
the rich in spirit?
Perhaps the real Homo sapiens is
different altogether, regardless of what we eat. See if you agree with Thomas’s
observations in
Key to Immortality. Perhaps human life has little to do with what we
eat. Perhaps…
PS. Please, don’t forget to write a brief review on
the Amazon for Key.
Your thoughts are important to me.
My webpage is http://stanlaw.ca.
Reviewers, ask for FREE downloads at mailto:stan@stanlaw.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment