Even the smartest people, those with
a string of PhDs to their name, do not pretend that they are computers. They
might sit in front of one for hours waiting for it to provide them with an
answer to some enigmatic question, alas, to no avail. Unless they punch some
keys, which will stir the hardware and software into action, nothing much
happens.
And yet, those
very same self-confessed savants claim that their brain acts on its own,
without the intercession of their will—their intangible, elusive, impalpable ‘Self’.
They simply cannot accept that that which cannot be seen, felt, measured or even
recognized by any of their increasingly complex electronic machinery seems to
control that which is measurable, tangible, palpable and equally as complex.
They can accept that it takes ‘them’
to drive a car, to operate a computer, but not to operate their brain.
“Au contraire,” they announce
in a loud voice filled with self-righteous self-importance. “We don’t think”, they say. “Our
brains do.”
Sad.
If that were true, they would
forever remain in a reactive mode. They would respond or react to the dictates
of their brain and genetic makeup—as does the rest of the animal kingdom.
Fortunately for the human species,
we are capable of being proactive.
The eternal question for people
steeped in scientific fundamentalism is whether brain produced mind, or did mind
produce brain. The chicken or the egg.
There is one other problem.
Expecting our brain to upgrade
itself with new information is like waiting for your car to fill itself with
gas, or your computer to design it’s own software. If we do not introduce new
software into our biological computer particularly in our older years, our
biological computer cannot handle the feedback from our senses and incorporate
it into its data storage.
Hence, it is up to us to continue
feeding new information to our brain, to analyze it, process it, and enrich our
data storage with the new facts, no matter what age we are. Otherwise a disorder
like Alzheimer might set in. We never reach an age when our brain can work by
itself. It needs continued upgrades with new data, which adjust the software to
handle new input.
Billions of years of evolution
equipped us with a magnificent computer that enables us to transpose ideas into
symbols we call words, and arrange them into a system of communication with
others. One day we shall learn to communicate our thoughts directly. It is the method
that most animals have retained, while we have lost it somewhere along our
arduous materialization of our illusory image of the world. It is high time to
reverse this foolhardy predilection.
Our minds created a magnificent
instrument. We must use it the way it had been intended to be used, and not
blame it for our inadequacies.
Marvin Clark called this apparent
enigma Chicken Omelet. See if you agree with him.
FREE DOWNLOADS
For reviews on Amazon
Free review copies at mailto:stan@stanlaw.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment