“Deciding
to review a book is like being a hotel receptionist in Monaco. Your
recommendations are expected to be impartial but with the dullness of uniform
options you steer your guests towards the hidden restaurant you fortuitously
discovered. You hope they will unfold their napkins and enjoy it as much as you
did. This book, the chef claims, was inspired by Richard Dawkins' 'The God
Delusion'. He may well have observed the famous atheist in the polished steel
kitchens of the Royal Society, cooking up traditional fare, steak and kidney
pudding, shepherds pie, boiled mutton with gene caper sauce, knowing the
palates of his readers will be satisfied with what they had expected, solid and
kind to the digestion. Honestly presented certainly, but then the chef has
become famous for that, no dressing things up with persuasive parsley. No
foreign muck.
In
contrast, the author of Delusions, Stanislaw Kapuściński, improvising in a
beach shack, has produced a smorgasbord of samples, surrounded by heaps of
bright chillies, unusual spotted gourds, sparkling sea salt, freshly
slaughtered cows…
His
narrative follows the traditional three courses; Man in the Nursery, in High
School, in University to tease out the growth and fossilization of Delusions
(of both religious and scientific kinds) and also to show the creation of time
(past, present and future) cementing and itself created by this division. It is
impossible to identify all the flavours that waft from this multidimensional
dish, except to urge a reader to order it. It gives a broad education across
both centuries and disciplines, and obscure and classical sources. As
importantly, it is enormous fun, spiced and aromatic. Unlike his posturing
'mentor' the author's irreverence and wit make his views the more compelling.
Kapuscinski's
intentions are early implied, to match Dawkins bite for bite and (as honestly)
to demonstrate the irreconcilable gulf between intellectual reductionism and emotional
religious dogmatism, each flailing towards fundamentalism in trying to flatten
one another. In that he takes on Dawkins full square and very gently gradually
knocks him over. Not by a deft left hook, but by tugging at his shirt. He
admires his opponent's skill and breadth of culture but laments it is not
sensitive to the deeper inspiration which might modify his intellectual
stridency.
This
reader bit into each dish with relish, savouring the fresh flavours of things
turned inside out, the familiar used uniquely, the telling argument nailed with
just enough illustration, but never too much. (A few infant prodigies to
question the central tenets of Darwinian gradual progress or the non-survival
of memory) Kapuściński's erudition is worn as lightly as a tee shirt pulled
over well exercised pectorals of Jesuitical education, Gnostic doctrine,
Sanskrit sources, mythological and symbolic familiarity of the Bible and Koran
which reduces both fossilised religious distortions and scientific certainties
(knowing more and more about less and less) over a bright flame, until both cry
for mercy. He remains fairly merciless and for that I celebrated.
In
the end it is the primacy of mind preceding brain, idea determining creation,
and responsibility in the moment of NOW that lies at the foundation of his
appeal to 'pragmatic realism'. The name sounds philosophically chilly,
deliberately eschewing inflation, but it belies the passion, and anger, and
incipient despair underpinning this very profound work. He gives you himself,
grated raw, and dipped into sauces, both sharp and honeyed. The appetite was
self-renewing, and consuming pages effortless.
What
remains is a deeply humane appeal to reap the best of human inspiration, devoid
of dogma, restoring, indeed pleading for, worshipful sanity derived from
self-knowledge and true identity. The essence of the individual, one with god,
was derived from the only sources that were left standing; the ancient
mythical, the repeated mystical and the personal experiential, now indivisible,
simultaneously being and becoming in a universe hopefully emptied of delusion
(and scientifically proved pretty empty of anything- the two are not
unconnected) but waiting for a better use of imagination and light, with little
time remaining. For all the chutzpah of this broad-brush annihilation of false
stanchions, the ornate pier has collapsed, the crisis he uncovers is urgent. I
thought it brilliant.”
Philippa Rees
Author:
Publisher
FREE DOWNLOADS
For reviews on Amazon
Free review copies at mailto:stan@stanlaw.ca
Your thoughts are important to me
I did order Sunday breakfast earlier!
ReplyDelete5:13 AM on Sunday? You must agree that the meal is heavenly.
ReplyDeleteI must have read your review a dozen times and each time I enjoy it. Perhaps even more so, each time. Thanks again, and again, and again... Philippa.
Fun to read, fun to write! Equally.
ReplyDelete