tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post1690686952159686212..comments2023-10-08T07:26:49.785-07:00Comments on Peter and Paul: Fundamentalismstan@stanlaw.cahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13240385919703527628noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-60305232580246195572015-10-11T11:15:27.140-07:002015-10-11T11:15:27.140-07:00I might reach their subconscious, not the consciou...I might reach their subconscious, not the conscious awareness which is virtually asleep. stan@stanlaw.cahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13240385919703527628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-61057795771012537952015-10-11T06:57:00.066-07:002015-10-11T06:57:00.066-07:00Yes I suspect you are right, but the 'many'...Yes I suspect you are right, but the 'many' that are nearly called might respond to a nudge? Especially well insinuated between the lines...and that you are very good at!Philippa Reeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04237512770210550162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-50155288177484241792015-10-11T06:22:14.997-07:002015-10-11T06:22:14.997-07:00I dare say. In my experience one can reinforce one...I dare say. In my experience one can reinforce one's views with the Few, and share them with the Many that are 'already' called. But attempting to reach the Third party, (the vast majority) whose ears are as yet firmly shut is an abortive endeavour. stan@stanlaw.cahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13240385919703527628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-13615967249325423762015-10-10T15:30:05.842-07:002015-10-10T15:30:05.842-07:00One of the difficulties in speaking to the non-con...One of the difficulties in speaking to the non-converted is to 'translate' their concepts ( ie Bearded man) into more universal and less fundamental ones. Is that not what Meader is attempting ?Philippa Reeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04237512770210550162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-78214895124669386142015-10-10T09:07:18.440-07:002015-10-10T09:07:18.440-07:00Meader, probably like myself, seems to be "pr...Meader, probably like myself, seems to be "preaching" to the converted. I object to the old man in need of a shave whose image is still identified with god. He talks of Singularity, but personalizes it with the word "God". We are in need of non-theistic concept to express the creative amorphous energy of the Universe. After all, there was no greater atheist than Yeshûa, who only recognized heaven within himself, with the attendant source of power and creativity. All religions, with the partial exception of Buddhism, destroyed this concept. stan@stanlaw.cahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13240385919703527628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-59270508290081946932015-10-10T08:13:29.455-07:002015-10-10T08:13:29.455-07:00But seriously.... a good extension of this post ht...But seriously.... a good extension of this post http://meader.org/2015/10/the-one-life/Philippa Reeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04237512770210550162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-47156166123901633302015-10-10T06:31:01.984-07:002015-10-10T06:31:01.984-07:00As one amoeba to another, thank you!
As one amoeba to another, thank you!<br />stan@stanlaw.cahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13240385919703527628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2860928176864796725.post-16710321013760186162015-10-10T06:23:11.334-07:002015-10-10T06:23:11.334-07:00Very fundamental Stan, the exposition of relativit...Very fundamental Stan, the exposition of relativity and the comparative anatomy of belief in the vortex of change. Here's looking at you, amoeba!Philippa Reeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04237512770210550162noreply@blogger.com